Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Hendrik Jebens vs Jerome Kym Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Jebens vs Kym analysis and find out who is favored!
Hendrik Jebens vs Jerome Kym Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Jebens 1 - 0 Kym
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jebens has won 37.64% of points on their second serve, while Kym has won 53.74%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jebens, in recent form, has won 36.42% of their opponent's second serve points, while Kym has won 52.46%. The same stats for first serve returns are 22.97% and 36.9% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jebens has saved 54.9% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kym has saved 54.67% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jebens has won 20% of matches played (W/L 2/ 8), with Kym winning 78.43% (W/L 40/ 11) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jebens has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 65/ 43), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 10/ 20). Kym has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 79% (W/L 23/ 6), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 12/ 10).
- Player level: In the last year, Jebens has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 25% of matches (W/L 2/ 6), where as Kym has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 78.57% of matches (W/L 22/ 6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Jebens winning 1 times and Kym being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Jebens winning 2 and Kym winning 0. The last match between Jebens and Kym was at the Mauthausen Challenger, 07-05-2023, Q1 round, Clay with Hendrik Jebens getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:29:35.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Jebens and Kym have played a deciding set 0 times, with Jebens winning 0 times and Kym 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Jebens winning 0, and Kym 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jebens has played against opponents with an average rank of 302.2 while Kym has played against players with an average rank of 156.04.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jebens has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kym has won 73% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jebens has converted 22.22% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kym has converted 41.64% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
281
Rank
281
High
21
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Form
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
50% (114-115)
Career Total W/L
68% (104-49)
0% (0-6)
YTD W/L
80% (32-8)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
3
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Hendrik Jebens | Jerome Kym |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:29:35 | 1:29:35 |
| 1st Serve % | 52% (32/61) | 66% (39/59) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 84% (27/32) | 69% (27/39) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 52% (15/29) | 45% (9/20) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 20% (1/5) |
| Return Points W% | 39% (23/59) | 31% (19/61) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Hendrik Jebens
Player
Jerome Kym
52%
(
32 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
23 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Hendrik Jebens | Jerome Kym |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/6) | 80% (32/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 14% (2/12) | 76% (67/21) |
| Games Win/Loss | 37% (48/81) | 59% (486/334) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 86% (6/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/4) | 83% (24/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 50% (2/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.54 | 0.52 |
| Aces Total | 34 | 208 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.17 |
| DFs Total | 14 | 68 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:32:35 | 1:39:30 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 311.67 | 150.1 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (264/442) | 63% (1546/2441) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (183/264) | 74% (1148/1546) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 38% (67/178) | 54% (481/895) |
| BPs Won% Total | 22% (6/27) | 42% (137/329) |
| Return Pts W% | 29% (110/384) | 43% (1183/2734) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/4) | 80% (12/3) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 80% (20/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/6) | 82% (32/39) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 70% (7/10) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/2) | 67% (6/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 97% (31/30) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 3% (31/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (5/0) | 22% (9/2) |
Hendrik Jebens Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Sebastian Ofner
Player
Hendrik Jebens
51%
(
28 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
75)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Hendrik Jebens
42%
(
41 of
97)
1st Serve %
53%
(
47 of
88)
5
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
6
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
34 of
47)
59%
(
33 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
36%
(
35 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
100
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hugo Dellien
Player
Hendrik Jebens
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
49%
(
29 of
59)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Duarte Vale
Player
Hendrik Jebens
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Hendrik Jebens
62%
(
59 of
95)
1st Serve %
60%
(
57 of
95)
7
Aces
15
5
Double Faults
1
80%
(
47 of
59)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
48 of
57)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
26 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
27 of
95)
96
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lucas Poullain
Player
Hendrik Jebens
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
71%
(
46 of
65)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gianmarco Ferrari
Player
Hendrik Jebens
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
58%
(
39 of
67)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
15 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hendrik Jebens
Player
Sandro Kopp
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
77%
(
43 of
56)
16
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
9 of
13)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
18 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Hendrik Jebens
69%
(
52 of
75)
1st Serve %
64%
(
72 of
113)
7
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
43 of
72)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
18%
(
4 of
22)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
26 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
52 of
113)
101
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hendrik Jebens
Player
Ramkumar Ramanathan
54%
(
25 of
46)
1st Serve %
64%
(
27 of
42)
7
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
53
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Jerome Kym Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Toby Alex Kodat
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
9 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Nino Serdarusic
59%
(
48 of
82)
1st Serve %
72%
(
50 of
69)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
29 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
84
Total Points Won
67
|
3-6 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
46%
(
42 of
92)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
92)
90
Total Points Won
73
|
6-2 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Pedro Cachin
58%
(
45 of
77)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
38%
(
12 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
44%
(
34 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Kyrian Jacquet
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
36 of
68)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Yoshihito Nishioka
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
94%
(
32 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
12 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Arthur Gea
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
70%
(
47 of
67)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Martin Krumich
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
57%
(
41 of
72)
3
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
7
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Norbert Gombos
52%
(
34 of
65)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
7
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Neil Oberleitner
Player
Jerome Kym
59%
(
79 of
133)
1st Serve %
58%
(
59 of
102)
15
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
1
75%
(
59 of
79)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
50%
(
27 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
6%
(
1 of
16)
35%
(
47 of
133)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
36 of
102)
122
Total Points Won
113
|
6-7(3) 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Jebens Vs Kym Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Jebens are available here and Kym photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
